Buy cheap, buy dear is an old adage that appears to have little resonance for Network Rail (NR).
As The Herald reveals today, problems on the West Coast Main Line (WCML) from London to Glasgow were largely due to short-term economies stemming from budget cuts at the state-backed owner of Britain's rail infrastructure.
Virgin Trains' poor punctuality on the route (at 16% almost twice as bad as the national average), led to chief operating officer Chris Gibb being seconded to NR to examine infrastructure failures. There are two worrying aspects to his finding that NR had not paid enough attention to the long-term performance of components used in the £9 billion upgrade of the route.
One is cost. In addition to effectiveness, speed is an essential component of successful maintenance and repair operation on the railway. The WCML is the busiest mixed-traffic rail route in Europe, making any delay a logistical problem. NR's chief executive Sir David Higgins has summed up the challenge in describing a major project at Bletchley near Milton Keynes carried out over Christmas as "extreme construction".
Nevertheless, equipment chosen because it was the most readily available or cheapest has had to be renewed sooner than expected, leading to increased costs in the medium to longer term. This is poor value, made worse by NR's approach to maintenance because global engineering firms are not willing to take responsibility for parts failures and on-going maintenance.
The second concern is the more fundamental one of the relationship between NR, the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) and the train operating companies. NR was set up as an independent but Government-backed group in 2003, following the financial collapse of Railtrack as a result of its liabilities after the Hatfield and Potters Bar derailments. In the absence of shareholders, the ORR keeps Network Rail on its toes by imposing multi-million pound fines if it breaches the conditions of its licence. Mr Gibb has criticised this approach as punitive and damaging to staff morale, with engineering managers feeling particularly at risk. The system is equally unsatisfactory to the public because fines lead to improvements being postponed or are recouped in increased fares, while NR approved substantial bonus packages for three directors earlier this year.
NR's managing director for network operations Robin Gisby likes to boast about the new paint they have applied to the Forth Bridge that has ended the famous need for continuous painting. Similar long-term thinking must now be applied to the network. Taxpayers and passengers, whose cross-Border fares will rise by 6.2% in January, are entitled to expect much better value for money on Britain's railways.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article