TIME is running out for Scotland's first national police service.
When the eight regional constabularies disappear on April 1, less than four weeks away, the new Police Service of Scotland will be expected to take their place without skipping a beat.
Crime, we can be sure, will not take a holiday.
For all our sakes, the 17,000 officers of the service must feel prepared for one of the biggest upheavals of devolution.
Ministers insist the public will not notice any difference in the quality of policing, despite the reforms saving £1.7 billion over 15 years and up to 3200 administrative jobs being scrapped. Those assurances would be more credible if the road to the merger had been a calm one.
But while the parallel merger of Scotland's eight fire-and-rescue services has caused barely a whisper, the police reforms have been raucous. At the heart of the matter has been a clash of two strong personalities, both used to getting their own way.
Stephen House, the former Chief Constable of Strathclyde who will head the new force, wants to control all of his staff, police and civilian. But the Scottish Police Authority, the watchdog created to oversee the force, says it should control some of the administrative staff.
The turf war raged for months until both sides apparently compromised. However, as we report today, the dysfunctional nature of the merger process was far worse than observers had ever imagined.
It is hard to believe such feuding is at an end. While the merger policy may be a good one in theory, the execution has been found wanting.
If ministers let the referendum distract them from the daily grind of good government, voters may well decide to punish their failings.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article