If next year was to be notable for simply the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow, the Ryder Cup and the anniversary of the beginning of the First World War it would still be a massively important one for Scotland.
The addition of the referendum on independence transforms it from "merely" important to truly historic.
But the confluence of such major events presents a challenge and opportunity for us all.
Indigenous Scottish press has a responsibility to fully capture the drama and excitement of these events - and in the case of the referendum to do so while giving both sides of the argument a fair crack of the whip - at a time when financial pressures and cultural changes are putting unprecedented pressure on resources.
The wider public has the chance to show Scotland in the best possible light to those outside our borders - who are watching sporting triumphs and political developments - as well as the duty to do so.
So what does this newspaper wish for as 2014 unfolds? First, of course, is that the country enjoys the Commonwealth Games and the Ryder Cup, and emerges from both events with its reputation for hospitality, friendliness and efficiency enhanced.
Secondly, that the referendum debate captures the public imagination and is the focus of respectful, passionate debate.
Both sides of the independence debate have some work to do in the early months of the year to encourage that debate.
The Yes camp must, as soon as is possible in 2014, begin to inspire and galvanise public debate. In a very real sense, it is the Yes camp which will suffer most if apathy wins out.
It is the Yes campaign which must persuade the public that a leap of faith is worth making and paint a picture of the country Scotland could become once independence is assured.
But Better Together should not simply stand back and hope the debate does not catch fire. We have consistently argued that Better Together has a responsibility to put forward a case for the benefits of the continuation of the union, rather than simply catalogue the problems - real or imagined - that independence might cause.
So far, that case has not yet been made, and there is no sign of any clear detail of what the future would hold for Scotland if it voted no in the referendum.
We believe that on September 18 the Scottish public should have two clear blueprints for the country's future ... not just one blueprint and a long list of hysterical warnings.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article