Of course there is, as David Cameron asserts, a strong case for military intervention in Iraq.
Abhorrent videos issued by Islamic State militants of British citizens being beheaded help make that case. So do the pleas for help from the Iraqi Government. The plight of communities in Iraq and Syria terrorised by IS fighters are another factor, not to mention the risk of a terrorist Caliphate bordering the Mediterranean.
There is, due to the request from Iraq, legal justification for intervening in that country. But there are major reservations about the military action backed by MPs at Westminster.
Will it be effective? Few observers can see how air strikes - bombings - can easily be used to prevent the beheading of hostages by militant groups. It could help push back forces and support ground troops, but we will not commit ground troops ourselves.
Mr Cameron says he has no intention of putting "boots on the ground" in Iraq, but it seems inevitable someone must.
Neither is it clear how intervention in Iraq alone can stem the threat from IS. Troubled MPs warned Mr Cameron that action will be needed in Syria too, if the danger presented by militant Islamists is to be checked in any meaningful way. He conceded such action would be justified, but is proceeding cautiously - due to a Commons defeat in a vote over attacks on Syria last year.
The SNP's MPs resolved to vote against the action on the basis that without a long-term strategy, mission creep is a danger. The party is right to raise these concerns.
Such a strategy, if it exists, remains opaque. Although he asserted during the Commons debate that a comprehensive plan existed for dealing with the IS threat, Mr Cameron did not clarify it.
The Prime Minister also rightly said it was vital to have a clear idea of what a successful outcome would look like. But he did not deliver this, either.
The tactic appears to be to go into Iraq - because this is the path of least opposition - and proceed from there. The Government appears to be placing a good deal of reliance on Iraqi and Kurdish troops to do the rest. Is this plausible? The Iraqi army failed to check the advance of IS militants - will still further British training help?
We also need to know the Government's exit strategy. The prime minister says UK armed forces could be in for the long haul, potentially for years. If entering an open-ended conflict without a clear script for success or withdrawal was ever acceptable, it is not any more. This is the third time in two decades our military will have intervened in Iraq. The mess the country is in now is of our own making.
Mr Cameron says military action must be part of a "comprehensive" political and humanitarian plan.
What is that plan? Mr Cameron has public support for action at present, as reflected in the Commons vote. But before we can give it unqualified support, we need to be given more detail about how this campaign is envisaged to develop, with a clear timescale and a recognised end point.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article