The suggestion that Fife's Longannet coal-fired power plant is a top polluter is not new.
The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) declared in October that it was one of the top two sources of carbon emissions in the country.
The argument put forward by the Brussels-based Health and Environment Alliance (Heal) is a little more nuanced. Its latest briefing looks at the health impact of burning fossil fuels across the UK.
It highlights Longannet and the Drax power station in North Yorkshire as having a major impact on the health of the nation at large and, in particular, on neighbouring communities.
By "belching out" thousands of tonnes of pollutants, including carbon dioxide, sulphur dioxide and particulates, Heal claims, the two plants are costing the NHS, in what it argues is an indirect subsidy to the industry. Such pollution has a direct cost in terms of lives lost to and medical treatment for heart and respiratory conditions.
It has a more indirect cost in terms of quality of life: a need for more treatment for asthma sufferers, for instance, and restrictions on those affected in terms of ability to work or to simply leave the house. Elderly people and children are most likely to be affected, the briefing says.
The report cites figures showing that the overall health cost from Longannet alone is estimated at a rather vague £310 million to £858m a year.
There is undoubtedly some truth in all of this. However, the coal industry has been quick to dispute the findings, claiming Heal is unaccountable and little more than a front for the green lobby. ScottishPower also insists that Longannet complies with emissions standards that are some of the toughest in Europe.
That does not diminish the power of Heal's argument.
But if we are to measure the health impact of fossil fuels we should be balanced. There are health risks on both sides.
Since the closure of Cockenzie Power Station, Longannet has been responsible for generating around one-quarter of all electricity used in Scotland. It provides hundreds of jobs directly on site, and ScottishPower argues it supports hundreds more in the wider community.
If it were to close, as some would prefer, there would be an inevitable impact on electricity prices. Fuel poverty also has a direct health cost.
Unemployment, as parts of Scotland know too well, has a significant impact upon health, so losing those jobs would be costly for the NHS too.
We need balance in our energy policy, and a rational mix of sources, including renewable energies and nuclear.
The central argument of the report is hard to disagree with, however. The role of coal power generation in accelerating climate change means that Europe ultimately needs to phase it out, it states.
We cannot go on ignoring warnings about climate change, and we must cut our dependence on fossil fuels. And until we can do so it is sensible to do all we can to cut the emissions from them.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article