Deciding how to treat any patient is a complex challenge.
Need must be balanced with available resources. This becomes acute in relation to life-threatening conditions such as heart disease. As The Herald revealed this week, heart patients in Scotland are being denied treatments which are now standard in the rest of the UK and Europe. Ticagrelor, a blood-thinning drug, is expensive compared with current treatments but was approved for use by the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) 18 months ago because it significantly increases the chances of survival. However, it is still not in general use because there has been no national agreement on which patients should receive it.
This delay and the unavailability of a less invasive valve operation as an alternative to open-heart surgery in Scotland was bitterly criticised by Professor Keith Oldroyd, director of research and development at the flagship Golden Jubilee National Hospital in Clydebank, in an interview with our health correspondent. He warned that Scotland lagged years behind the rest of the UK and Europe. The time limit for emergency insertion of a stent in a blocked artery, for example, is 120 minutes after a heart attack in Europe but still only 90 minutes in most of Scotland.
The discrepancies deserve closer scrutiny. The chair of the Scottish Government's national advisory committee on heart disease, Dr Barry Vallance, tells The Herald today, that the delay in introducing ticagrelor is not due to cost restraints but to three separate views among regional groups of cardiologists about which patients should receive it. It is important that consensus is reached for two reasons. First, the criteria must achieve the best outcome for patients. Secondly, they should also apply uniformly across the country to avoid the development of a postcode lottery.
As the frontiers of medicine are being pushed back at an extraordinary rate, it is important that new techniques and treatments are properly evaluated. Not all will benefit every potential patient. Dr Vallance argues that Scotland's caution in introducing new procedures is the right approach. In particular, he warns that TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation), the technique for high-risk patients as an alternative to open-heart surgery, which is not available in Scotland, is not a wonder cure.
Nevertheless it is unacceptable that a treatment that significantly increases the chance of survival is standard in England but not available, or requires special pleading, in Scotland. When new drugs are approved for use in the NHS in England and Wales, health trusts are required to introduce them within three months. However they then bill primary care trusts for the cost. In Scotland, funding is via health boards responsible for financing the full range of services. This requires increased costs in one area to be balanced by cuts elsewhere. It is right that the most expensive new treatments are implemented with caution. Cost-benefit decisions are undeniably difficult but, once a new medicine has been approved, a timeframe for its introduction should be considered in the move to consistency.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article