Glitz, glamour, tears and tantrums: it is that time of year again – awards season.
Watching famous filmmakers and actors competing against each other for the ultimate prize, a golden statuette, is addictive.
Awards ceremonies are essentially a Hollywood back-slapping exercise but they are not without risks. One bad acceptance speech (I'm looking at you, Sally Field) and you will struggle to get a decent role for at least a decade afterwards.
The season kicked off in style on Sunday night with the Golden Globes, and next up is the unfortunately named SAG (Screen Actors Guild) awards on January 27, before the crowning glory in the awards calendar, the Academy Awards, take place on February 24.
Actors can make or break their reputation as a style icon during awards season. Yet many A-listers often make terrible fashion choices, even though they employ top stylists to dress them and have their pick of the best gowns from prestigious fashion brands. Take Lucy Liu at this year's Golden Globes. Her ill-advised Carolina Herrera gown looked like a set of bloom-covered curtains from a retirement home.
Awards season can be terribly vacuous, but immensely enjoyable. And there is no doubt the film and fashion industries benefit from these high-profile events, with tons of free advertising for the labels the stars choose to wear and a guaranteed increase in cinema admission and DVD sales for the movies that win big.
My favourite thing about awards season is seeing a famous actor unconvincingly clap and smile when they fail to win their category. If there was an Oscar handed out to the best loser, I suspect they would struggle to find someone to award it to.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article