FRUITLESSLY, I've railed against the unnecessary, frankly worrying sadism displayed in popular Scandinavian crime dramas.
The violence against women, in particular, is appalling and should be enough for writers of the likes of Denmark's Those Who Kill to be put under police surveillance.
A precedent for this sort of show was probably Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho, with its famous stabbing-in-the-shower scene, though that was genteel and decorous compared to the chainsaw-wielding madness we get now. Then again Psycho was a horror film and not a police procedural, so we can't say we weren't warned. Or at least we thought it was a horror film. Now we're told it was a comedy.
Yup, in an interview uncovered in BBC archives, Hitchcock says he intended the film to be "rather tongue-and-cheek". He's having a laugh, right? The jowly oddball continued: "The content was, I felt, rather amusing and it was a big joke. I was horrified to find some people took it seriously."
Perhaps he should have added a laughter track so that we'd ken when to giggle. Hitchers was speaking in 1964 and you can hear his haverings on a new audiobook, Alfred Hitchcock: In His Own Words. It coincides with a biopic about the controversial director, which I won't be going to see, as I'm too frightened of neds to visit the cinema.
Yeah, well, maybe the problem is mine, right enough. Feart, sensitive, squeamish, yada-yada. And, in a sense, you can almost see what Hitchcock meant about Psycho. There was that scary hoose from central casting. And the Anthony Perkins character was clearly a bit of a daftie. Then there was his maw being deid all along: hilarious.
I've seen Shaun of the Dead, so I know horror can be funny. But Pscyho the comedy? Hmm. Scary thought.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article