"I FIRST heard Personville called Poisonville by a red-haired mucker named Hickey Dewey in the Big Ship in Butte." You're there already, aren't you?
In the story. Hearing the voice. Wanting to hear more. Dashiell Hammett's novel Red Harvest is some 83 years old, but, as a new Orion reprint proves, it's still alive and kicking. Right from the start.
First lines have to hit hard. Last lines are culminations, carrying all the weight and melancholy and learning of what has gone before. But first lines are about impact, about dragging you in, getting you hooked.
They also need to tell you something about the world you're entering. Orwell puts us at our unease quite simply in 1984: "It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen." Paul Auster, meanwhile, mashes up hardboiled noir with existential dread in City of Glass: "It was a wrong number that started it, the telephone ringing three times in the dead of night, and the voice on the other end asking for someone he was not." You already know what to expect for the rest of the novel from those 31 words.
First lines are show-off lines. Lines where the author often reveals what kind of writer he is. You want to know about Iain Banks? Just read the first line of The Crow Road. "It was the day my grandmother exploded." All the darkness and the teenage ghoulish glee that animates its middle-aged author is on display.
My favourite may be from Toni Morrison's Paradise. "They shoot the white girl first." Just six words. And yet they set up the story, establish the book's concern with race and set us up for the horror that follows. They also burn with a righteous anger. Six words. So few. But they contain so much.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article