I've never had blonde hair (and wouldn't suit it quite frankly) but thanks to the stars of Alfred Hitchcock's classic films, it has a lasting allure.
Hitchcock once said that "blondes make the best victims" and the blondes in his films are glacial, cool and unattainable.
They are the polar opposite of that other blonde archetype: the ditsy blondethat actresses such as Marilyn Monroe played so well.
From the posh society gals that Grace Kelly plays in Rear Window and To Catch a Thief to Tippi Hedren as the put-upon heroine in The Birds and Marnie, blondes are at the centre of Hitchcock's films. They tear up the screen, leaving Hollywood's best leading men in their wake. James Stewart and Cary Grant have suffered this fate, as both were arguably upstaged by their leading ladies Kim Novak and Eva Marie Saint in Vertigo and North by Northwest respectively.
There are drawbacks to being a Hitchcock blonde though, as the TV film The Girl and the movie Hitchcock, bith released last year, show. They document the predatory nature of Alfred Hitchcock and show the mental abuse and unwanted sexual attention that the director enforced on his female stars.
I like to think that the Hitchcock blondes get the last laugh, though, as the director's legacy is now tarnished as a result of his cruel behaviour. Unfortunately standing up to Hitchcock never worked out well at the time as Tippi Hedren found to her cost when she refused to work with Hitchcock again and demanded he release her from the exclusive contract she had signed. He refused to do so, which stopped her from being able to work elsewhere and effectively ended her career.
But now she is getting her own back and telling the world what sort of man Hitchcock really was.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article