GERRY Anderson's departure to that great puppet theatre in the sky reminds the world he's no longer around to create icons such as Lady Penelope.
And for those who were schoolboys of the early sixties comes a stark reminder of the part the blonde marionette played in the formation of young minds.
Lady Penelope was for many their very first example of posh totty, a back-combed creature from another world who represented racy fun, who excited and gave promise of an exciting life ahead, should a young man from a tenement close ever get the chance to meet such magnificence.
Lady Penelope Creighton-Ward may have come with a few strings attached, but she had many attributes. She could ski, was street smart, could speak several languages – and how could you not be attracted to a sophisticate who wore a perfume called Soupcon de Peril? What also attracted me to LP was the way she handle men. She was an international level flirt, who could bat her super-thick eyelashes like bats wings, yet she knew the line; men such as Jeff Tracy of International Rescue were allowed to zip up her dress – but no more.
As for her treatment of Parker? Well, it's a surprise he could retain liquid given the number of times her stilletos walked all over him.
And we loved her for that. But Lady P also paved the wave for my adoration of an entire line of hoity-toity sirens; Grace Kelly, Honor Blackman, Sylvia Sims, Hayley Mills, all the way through to Felicity Kendal.
Yes, when Thunderbirds took flight again in TV re-runs Lady Penelope was criticised for smoking, wearing furs and not wearing a seat belt. And rightly so. But we have to remember she was different class. And of her time. Gerry Anderson's time, in fact.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article