THE name didn't mean much to me until recently, when I got hooked on Borgen, the enthralling Danish political drama.
As the series opens, it's election time. Sidse plays Birgitte Nyborg, the leader of Denmark's Moderate Party who, before long, is propelled into the Prime Minister's office as head of a coalition government.
The series reminds you of The West Wing, even if it is set in a much smaller country (Denmark population: 5.5 million; USA: 314 million). But the outlines are roughly the same: a succession of political crises and situations, interwoven with more personal matters. Nyborg may be a neophyte when it comes to the kind of job that puts you in charge of a country, but she is no pushover. Before our eyes, she finds her feet, grows into the job, grows in confidence, and keeps her colleagues in line – and, just as importantly, tries to ensure she has enough time for her husband and two children.
Sidse's nuanced performance makes Nyborg utterly believeable. At times we see little flickers of the eyes that register inner uncertainty; at others, there's a steelier hue to them as Nyborg deals briskly with recalcitrant colleagues. Sidse is equally decisive off the set, saying recently: "[Borgen's] three male writers wanted her always to be reproaching herself, feeling guilty, being soppy in her private life- and I didn't like that. She was always crying, and you wouldn't believe her to be a prime minister if she did that. The character's not a hairdresser- to get that far in politics you have to be, you know, she's a female politician."
Well put. The season one boxset is in the shops, season two wraps up on BBC 4 on Saturday night. If you haven't watched Borgen yet, now's the time.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article