How did your present-giving go?
Never mind "was Santa good to you?", how good a Santa were you?
I know a little girl who is, frankly, embarrassed by the whole business of present-receiving. She unwraps with reluctance if she thinks she is the centre of attention and assesses the value of the gift (not monetarily, but as a thing she might want, need or enjoy) at her private leisure. When you receive a thank-you note, you know every word is meant.
Watching my nearest and dearest tearing the paper off on Tuesday, it has become obvious you really can't go wrong with socks, pants and hankies. Obviously you can go badly wrong with the underwear but, assuming you are aware of the taste and – crucially – size of the recipient, you will always be rewarded with gratitude. No-one wants to spend time and money on socks, pants and hankies, and everyone needs them.
So, the absence of the usual expensive boxers from the older offspring's pile of presents was immediately noticed, and rectified by his mother, who had forgotten to parcel then up although they had been purchased, as per.
The hosiery – warm, woollen and fancy, for lounging in front of the telly or keeping the chill from penetrating the expensive, but not necessarily substantial, new winter boots – was greeted with glee by the female of the species, young and old.
I sense scepticism about the handkerchiefs, but a crisp mouchoir is the accessory de nos jours. Like a terry nappy rather than disposables, they are environmentally friendly. For the lady, a clean one to drop daintily in the path of prospective beau is a Downton-style requirement.
Like a newspaper's hatches, matches and dispatches, socks, pants and hankies belong in your Christmas wrapping paper. You'll be rewarded with a smile, and maybe even a note.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article