The sound of the 1980s isn't Johnny Marr's guitar, or the starter motor of a Mini Metro, or the theme tune to Dallas.
The sound of the 1980s is sqee-sqee-kkaa-sqee which is the noise a ZX Spectrum game used to make while it was loading.
This year the Spectrum is 30 years old, which is a good opportunity to remember just how exciting it was at the time. Many of us already had the predecessor, the ZX81, but that was black and white and all you could do was make your name scroll down the screen. Even so, we thought: wow, in the future, we will all be able to make our names scroll down screens in black and white.
Then the Spectrum arrived and it was exhilarating, like being shouted at by angry primary colours. My favourite game was Hungry Horace, which featured a character with a blue head who liked skiing. I have no idea what it meant but this was the 1980s – it made no sense but that didn't matter, just like Duran Duran videos.
And now, to mark the Spectrum's birthday, the British Film Institute is throwing a party in London and, even though I loved my Spectrum, I won't be there because, in the end, I don't like where the home computer eventually took us: to Twitter and Kindles and to the cold, dead eyes of commuters staring into their mobiles.
Which is the problem with progress? In the early days, it's wonderful. In the 1920s, only a few pioneers drove cars. In the 1950s, only a handful of heroes climbed Everest. In the 1980s, only a small group of people spoke into mobiles.
And then everyone muscles in and something wonderful and strange becomes ubiquitous and ugly. Progress is good, but only in the hands of the first, clever, beautiful pioneers.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article