THERE are hazards in buying stuff online.
I don't refer to your financial details being pilfered, which is unusual. No, the risks I'm thinking of include items taking weeks to arrive or not being in stock or coming in a different colour from the photie.
But, worse than these, for sheer dastardliness, for the breaking of agreements, is the practice of inviting you to tick a box saying you don't want regular emails, newsletters or offer from the company under advisement. And then ignoring it. True, in most cases, it's then usually quite simple to "unsubscribe", probably because some authority somewhere makes them provide this service. But when you didn't subscribe in the first place, their cheek in waddling uninvited into your inbox is deplorable.
I don't know if Karl Marx, Adam Smith or any of these economist dudes noticed this, but capitalism is all about hustling. They're always in your face and, these days, when our faces are increasingly glued to screens, that's where the capitalists position themselves.
Of course, not all capitalists are bad. You may buy something from a holistic health company and find their newsletters thrilling or amusing. But when you specifically didn't ask for them, it fair messes up your chakras and blooters your inner serenity, ken?
It's time for some good old-fashioned compulsion in internet affairs. A few rules. Prime among these must be the understanding that, when we tick a box saying we don't want something, we shouldn't get it, if you get my d.
After all, we went to all that trouble of clicking the tick. We paid attention to the tricky bit whereby sometimes you have to unclick a tick or where a clicked tick actually means you want the pestilential missives. We played by the rules. Time for internet businesses to do the same.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article