I wholeheartedly agree with David Crossley's comments regarding the west coast train line (Letters, May 26).
When I made this journey a few years ago the coach windows were so filthy that passengers could hardly see the spectacular scenery, there was no information on the train to say what was being observed (although the train was full of visitors) and the lavatories were simply awful. On reaching Mallaig, it was raining and decidedly chilly but there was nowhere to go apart from a fish and chip shop and one cafe.
I was in Mallaig recently, another extremely cold day, but apart from a few more eating places, it is not at all a welcoming destination.
Scotland really does have to improve standards, and I don't mean to turn it into a theme park, if we want to encourage visitors and to get them to return.
At present for me it is a case of once bitten, twice shy.
Isobel Ives,
Arnottsfield, Comrie.
I was interested in your article about Jimmy Savile's cottage at Glen Coe as, long ago, it was a place of respite for me ("Savile's Glen Coe home to become base for climbers", The Herald, May 19).
After leaving school in 1944, I made a cycling tour around Scotland, which included travelling from Crianlarich through Glen Coe to Fort William.
I was fortunate to have excellent weather, particularly when cycling up Black Mount and through Glen Coe, but I was tired and thirsty. Stopping at Allt na Reigh cottage, which in those days was beside the road, I knocked the door and asked if I could have a glass of milk. One arrived and no payment was requested. The new Allt na Reigh can therefore be regarded as carrying on a custom.
RC Callander,
6 Learmonth Gardens, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article