THE final taxpayers' bill for security at the London Olympics has been put at anything between £500m to £540m ("Security costs for 2014 games triple to £90m", The Herald, December 19).
Surely four months on from what were judged to be the most successful games ever, it must be the case that somewhere around the east end of London, there's a big cupboard stuffed full of highly refined and expensive security hardware. Why do we have to go out and buy all the same stuff again?
Alan Smith,
2 Kirkton Road, Neilston.
MY fond wish for 2013 is that someone will prick the never-ending 2014 Commonwealth Games PR bubble. We have seen 2014 linked to litter initiatives, food tsars and new art. Have we forgotten the £500,000 lottery investment in a temporary football pitch "installation" in the woods as part of the Cultural Olympiad – now a drinking den? Scotland's medal prospects in 2014 are thin; sport participation in all but the middle classes continues in freefall; competitive sport in schools is a thing of the past save for in the independent sector; councils have less resource to support sport so costs rise and availability of facilities decline; obesity is tomorrow's health disaster far greater than cancer in itself. The talk of a 2014 legacy and a bold new future is as wide of the mark as the Mayan predictions for the end of the world. The term "spin over substance" has never been more appropriate.
Robert Bennie,
Clayslaps Road, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article