The claim by UK Treasury Chief Danny Alexander that mortgage costs would rise in an independent Scotland is nonsensical (Alexander claims: yes to independence could mean mortgage rise, News, June 24).
This is yet another anti-independence scare story which we should become increasingly accustomed to in the run-up to the 2014 independence referendum.
Mr Alexander doesn't seem to know the difference between mortgage availability in the private sector and government bond issues. Banks base their mortgages on the interest rate set independently by the Bank of England, which in a proposed sterling zone would be exactly the same for Scotland as for England. The other issue affecting mortgage rates is the ability of banks as commercial businesses to borrow on the markets – and as we have just seen with the downgrade of 15 global banks and financial institutions, that has nothing to do with the country they are based in.
Scotland has better public finances than the UK as a whole – and lower public-sector debt than the UK, the EU and the G7 average. We boast, for example, a £1.5 trillion asset base in the North Sea, with over half of the oil and gas value still to be extracted. On Danny Alexander's illiterate economics, mortgages could go up in the rest of the UK because they would struggle as a new country without the benefit of Scottish resources. The reality is that both Scotland and the rest of the UK will be successful, independent countries.
Alex Orr
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article