THE reason the Royal Navy can't field enough ships (Letters, October 29) is not due to budget cuts but because of its unabated penchant for ever more complex, unaffordable vessels.
In particular, it continues to waste money designing and fielding frigates that are fundamentally over-manned, over-armed, maintenance-intensive, fragile and inefficient for peacetime duties, and which in any "hot war" would rapidly fall victim to satellite-based targeting. This endless pursuit of capability regardless of cost, which first took real hold in the late 1970s (later egged-on by a poor showing in the Falklands War) has resulted in an "inverted hockey stick"' trend in terms of the number of escort-type vessels that our Navy can afford.
The truth is that the Royal Navy's whole concept of frigate-type vessels and frigate-type operations is an obsolete and anachronistic irrelevance, tailored more to the open-ocean mass naval deployments of the Cold War era than as an efficient and cost-effective solution to modern (essentially patrol and monitoring) needs.
With the Royal Navy's frigate force coming due for renewal, there is a golden opportunity to change this by moving towards a larger, lower-cost and more functional fleet based on ocean-going patrol ships (lean-manned, commercially outfitted ships equipped solely with guns, a helicopter and a detachment of troops) with chartered-in offshore support vessels for sonar and minehunting operations.
Unfortunately the Ministry of Defence has its head buried in the past, and persists instead with a Type-26 frigate programme that will equip our navy with replacement ships that are unaffordable in the numbers necessary for even our basic maritime security needs, let alone meaningful participation in overseas operations.
Mark Campbell-Roddis,
1 Pont Crescent,
Dunblane.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article