There is no doubt that George Square would benefit from a sympathetic revamp ("T in the Park promoter will help choose square's design", The Herald, October 6 & Letters, October 1 and 4).

Replacement of the dreadful red surface with quality paving – preferably impervious to chewing gum – and extending between the Cenotaph and the City Chambers would certainly enhance the square. Parking spaces should be removed and the little-used Hanover Street made a dedicated drop-off point for coaches, allowing visitors safe and direct access to shops, restaurants, the Information Centre and George Square. The reinstatement of the lost lawns, trees, and benches is surely worthy of consideration.

There seems to be a lack of joined-up thinking within the City Chambers. George Square is so often marred by tents and other paraphernalia. Most events could be more suitably housed elsewhere, such as Glasgow Green for funfairs and pop concerts, and McLellan Galleries for art shows such as the Royal Glasgow Institute. The cost of refurbishment would be a fraction of the proposed George Square work. Surely this substantial amount of money would be better spent elsewhere.

It seems a decision has already been made to remove the statues. If this happens, I have severe doubts they will ever be returned. No other civic space in Britain contains so many statues, and while some may appear to have only tenuous links to Glasgow's past, all represent a period in the history of the city which is admired by visitors. As for Sir Walter Scott, whose influence on Scottish tourism is widely recognised, it seems that, as a tourist guide, I will be denied the chance to repeat with pride – as I always do when introducing the city – it shows the big-hearted warmth and generosity of Glasgow that a son of Edinburgh is in this most prominent position.

Fionna Eden-Bushell,

32 Clouston Street, Glasgow.