I was privileged to be present at Sunday's Celtic Connections presentation of Scots in the Spanish Civil War.
We were there with two dear friends, both Liverpudlian (one whose father was a distinguished Brigadista) and long settled on this side of the Border, who may well vote No in the referendum. We stood shoulder to shoulder with the entire audience to sing The Internationale and Bandiera Rossa and cry: "No pasaran".
Well, Franco's fascists, with the complicity of our politicians, did pass and it took the horrors of a world war to put them back in their box, yet they still manage to wriggle out.
I was shocked to read a fascist (or far-right) demonstration took place in Glasgow on that same day but, while the police may have had difficulty restraining the crowds who wanted to discourage them, it surely is encouraging to learn the people of Glasgow will not tolerate this foulness on their turf.
Ours is a nation where people are proud to sing of the uniting of the human race.
K M Campbell,
Bank House,
Doune.
What wisdom was behind Strathclyde Police's decision to allow the desecration of a place of personal and community tragedy in Pollokshields on Sunday ("Far-right protest brings angry scenes to south side of Glasgow", The Herald, January 21)?
The Pollokshields community, not to mention the family and friends of the victim, William McKeeney, had stated clearly and in unambiguous terms that the far-right rabble that is the Scottish Defence League was not welcome in their local community.
A small band of between five to 10 extremists was allowed to enter a community in which they have zero credibility – even more galling given that this area is Scotland's most ethnically diverse demographic. Local organisations and community representatives have worked tirelessly for years, not only to develop positive internal community relations but to engage the community with key service providers such as the police. Melville Street is not a civic space.
Danny Boyle,
31 Vennard Gardens,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article