ALAN J Sangster writes that it is a "myth" that wind power is unreliable (Letters, February 14).
The 25% capacity factor (CF) he quotes for a single wind farm is an estimate used by the wind industry when assessing the viability of a wind installation, to reflect the unreliability of wind, and the actual measured CFs of all wind installations confirms this using the data which is readily available on the Renewable Energy Foundation website.
As for the claim that, if there were enough wind turbines across the European continent, they could be generating electricity 100% of the time, this makes no practical sense. On a few days in the past month, out of a national grid metered total capacity of all installed wind turbines in the UK of around 7,300MW, less than 500MW was actually being generated – a far cry from 100%, not to mention a highly inefficient use of the high capital investment involved.
As for the highly theoretical concept of combining and co-ordinating wind and solar electricity generation with other renewable generation systems across Europe incorporating a low-loss high-voltage DC grid plus associated massive electricity storage, this can only be classified as a wishful thinking. Even if all the technology were commercially available, this proposal would be prohibitively expensive.
Recent measurements of Arctic ice shows the highest gain in ice levels since satellite measurement records began in 1980.
Dr G M Lindsay,
Whinfield Gardens,
Kinross.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article