I note the Cato Institute has described Scotland as one of the poorer and more socialist parts of the United Kingdom ("US think tank: Scotland most socialist part of Great Britain", The Herald, December 11).
It is entitled to its views but it is perhaps worthwhile mentioning what the Cato Institute does think is a sound economic policy. Before 2008 it was prominently promoting Iceland as the model other countries should follow with the country having adopted a flat tax, privatised many enterprises and running a deregulated banking system.
On the Cato website Iceland is no longer promoted prominently but a search does show a paper from August 2007, praising the policies Iceland was taking, describing glowing success and saying it was "predictable". The paper concludes by stating Iceland is in for more good times and policy makers should focus on cutting taxes and deregulating banks further. Within a year Iceland's banking system had experienced utter collapse and to save the economy the Government has had to abandon the policies Cato praised. The result being recovery.
Anyone can make a mistake, of course, but this is a pretty big one, and what is telling is that Cato has not learned from it and continues to push exactly the same policies. It simply no longer uses Iceland as its poster child. Given this it would be a foolish person who regarded the views of the Cato Institute with regards to Scotland as worth following. Their pessimism about Scottish independence has raised my optimism.
Iain Paterson,
2F Killermont View, Glasgow.
In contemplating its future, and whatever the course, I devoutly hope Scotland will not be swayed by the opinion or advice of the Cato Institute.
In taking Scotland's independence aspirations to task, this ultra-right font of extremist libertarianism commits the familiar outrage of the American right in invoking Adam Smith. If they care to read the great Scots economist and moral philosopher they would find the following: "The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities" (The Wealth of Nations, 1776).
Not exactly the stuff of the Cato Institute, but perhaps more in line with the social contract of an independent Scotland.
David C Speedie,
15 Warfield Street, Upper Montclair, New Jersey, USA.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article