I WAS interested to read your report which said that the Scottish Government is considering proposals for a programme of capital expenditure which includes a new road crossing of the Forth ("Mapping out a £70bn bid to boost Scottish economy", The Herald, December 7)).
If the outcome of the investigation of the cables of the existing Forth Bridge shows that protective treatment of the cables is possible (say by instalments), then the budget for a new bridge should be re-allocated to other capital projects.
These could include, for example, urgent improvement to the A9 trunk route to Inverness, the long-awaited high-speed rail network, and the Edinburgh trams project.
The observation, first made by Professor Holford of University College London, at the time when the M1 motorway was promulgated, that "traffic expands to fill the space available" is as true today as it was 50 years ago.
In other words, more road space will always equate to more traffic.
In planning terms, the case for a second Forth road bridge is contradictory.
If it does not increase capacity then it serves little purpose.
If it is intended to increase capacity, the existing residential areas, especially Corstorphine, will suffer increasing stress.
The case for a tunnel under the Forth from Granton is growing ever more compelling.
Alan Wightman,
Inveralavaig,
Portree.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article