I NOTE the interest you have taken in the debate around the provision of care for older people in the country ("Care firm organisation warns of looming recruitment crisis" , The Herald, November 16).
This is not a straightforward issue and any analysis must be balanced by the fact that over the past five years the care home sector alone within social care has seen year-on-year increases in local authority rates, amounting to some 12.9%. This year alone saw a 2.5% increase in care home fees, creating a £2.5m budget pressure in Glasgow Social Work Services.
Whilst the majority of care homes in Glasgow provide excellent care and support, sustaining quality remains a huge challenge to all of us concerned with the care of older people. Regrettably there have been some examples of poor care in some homes in recent times that have required council and Care Inspectorate interventions to remedy. It is not at all clear from this experience that the sector as a whole has invested its increased fee income in higher salaries to low-paid staff or their training, or indeed would do so were those rates to be increased even further.
Scottish Care is an important strategic partner in Glasgow's Reshaping Care for Older People activity and it shares our concern that care standards must be maintained. We have ample evidence of private care homes in Glasgow providing excellent care within the existing financial framework.
I would, however, like to see an evidenced argument that reinvestment from other areas of the health and social care system is needed to ensure a similarly excellent experience for older people in all care homes. This is at a point when the Scottish Government's policy direction, one which I entirely agree with, is to shift the balance of care towards ensuring that older people are able to stay in their homes longer, which is where older people generally report they would rather be.
David Williams,
Executive director,
Social Work Services,
Glasgow City Council.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article