I hope that, on reflection, Ruth Davidson will realise how foolish her comments that Scotland risks becoming "Balkanised to an extent" and "not quite like Northern Ireland, but somewhere closer to it" in the aftermath of an entirely peaceful, democratic referendum were (Leader interviews, News, April 26).
It is utterly irresponsible, offensive and absurd to compare, even obliquely, our current political situation to the genocide that followed the disintegration of Yugoslavia or the decades of sectarian discrimination and death that engulfed Northern Ireland. Such hysterical comments demonstrate a worrying ignorance of history, a rather crude attempt at equivalence and a complete incomprehension of the true nature of Scotland's civic nationalist movement.
If Ms Davidson wishes for her and her party to be taken seriously by a Scottish electorate that is neither irreparably nor violently divided, she should pick her words much more carefully in future.
David Kelly
Edinburgh
So, there we have it from the mouths of the Westminster party leaders: if Scotland dares to vote SNP the Westminster Unionist Parties will ignore us. Did I hear that an election is an opportunity for the people to have a democratic choice? Ah! That is only if Westminster approves of the choice we make.
It would seem that Westminster would rather see a coalition government where the junior partners are Ukip or Ulster Unionists: is Scotland so insignificant that it may be ignored? We'll see; there is a great difference between the rhetoric before an election and how things turn out once the country has delivered its verdict. Let's hold firm and be amused by the words which are eaten and swallowed by the Westminster politicians when a sizeable number of SNP MPs are elected on May 7.
Brian Rattray
Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article