IN response to the self-styled "informed observer" Alex Gallagher's views on the democracy he believes is our system of government, I would like to raise some questions.
First, where, in his view of democracy, does the unelected and obscenely expensive House of Lords feature?
Secondly, where in this democratic Utopia does the intervention of the supposedly impartial unelected but apparently "purring"'monarch feature?
Next, we have the intervention of the avowedly impartial unelected civil service, whose excuse for contravening centuries of adherence to the rules of non-intervention was that the Treasury didn't like the prospect of change - in what way is this democratic?
Finally, is it a feature of democracy that the losing side in an election or referendum gives up its beliefs and ceases to work for its goals ?
It really is time to realise that citizens of Scotland of all parties and none who want independence are here to stay.
Alice Watt,
Newton Street, Greenock.
NOBODY, either in the SNP or any of the other parties and individuals who were on the losing side in the independence referendum last year has ever said that the vote was anything other than a disappointment. But why should that mean they have to ignore the plain fact all the independence -supporting parties have received huge boosts in membership numbers and that opinion polls have also been very encouraging?
Alex Gallagher asks if Yes supporters have grasped the meaning of democracy. Perhaps in his universe losing an election or a referendum means forever holding your peace, but I haven't noticed that Scottish Labour, the Scottish Conservatives or the Scottish Liberal Democrats have vanished from the face of the earth after performing so badly in the last Holyrood election.
I'm sorry if it upsets Mr Gallagher but I'm afraid that proponents of Scottish independence are going to continue to make the case in the certainty that in time we will prevail.
David C Purdie,
12 Mayburn Vale, Loanhead.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article