Dr GM Lindsay (Letters, February 16) claims "recent measurements of Arctic ice shows the highest gain in ice levels since satellite measurement records began in 1980".
In fact Paul Holland of the British Antarctic Survey explained in November that "the Arctic is losing sea ice five times faster than the Antarctic is gaining it, so, on average, the Earth is losing sea ice very quickly. There is no inconsistency between our results and global warming".
The myth that Arctic ice is growing is repeated endlessly despite the facts.
Dr Lindsay also quotes statistics on wind turbine capacity from the Renewable Energy Foundation (REF). The biographies of REF's technical advisory group on its website show it includes David White, who was a senior manager for Esso and Exxon "over a 30- year period".
It also includes Professor Michael Jefferson, who worked for Shell Oil in several senior positions.
Another is Hugh Sharman, whose company Incotecto is involved in enhanced oil recovery, which is a way of getting more oil out of existing oilfields by pumping carbon dioxide into them, with the hoped for bonus of storing it in them to stop it going into the atmosphere.
There is some doubt about whether this will work permanently, especially if there is seismic activity.
Not all of the foundation's members were or are employed in the oil and gas industry, but enough that we should perhaps be wary of accepting their statistics without checking other sources first.
Wind would certainly be far more effective as a source of power if we had more storage capacity, and investing in that storage capacity would be expensive, but we will need it sooner or later anyway.
Renewables are not the main cause of rising electricity bills either – that would be growing global demand combined with systematic overcharging by energy companies, as found in a study by Manchester University.
Duncan M McFarlane,
Beanshields,
Braidwood,
Carluke.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article