I AM bewildered and bemused (sometimes amused) at two subjects which consistently appear in your columns; the fact that Alex Salmond was a failure as leader of the SNP and the notion that the SNP should "accept" the result of the referendum (Letters, November 15).
Let me point out that I am neither the biggest fan of the former nor a member of the latter, merely an interested observer of the referendum and its fall-out.
First, to those who claim Alex Salmond was a failure as the leader of the SNP; I have a feeling that if Johann Lamont had enjoyed the same level of "failure" as Alex Salmond she would not have fallen on her sword.
Secondly, to those who say that the SNP should "accept" the result of the referendum; this is preposterous.
The SNP, like all democratic political parties, have accepted the result of the referendum. I see no calls to insurrection, fighting on the streets or violent uprising to overthrow the Westminster Government. They have "accepted" the referendum result.
But to say they should now pack up and go away? Ridiculous.
To those who say that, can I suggest that a clue as to why they should not and will not lies in their title?
Using this same logic would these pundits and correspondents suggest the Greens stop campaigning on an environmental ticket because they failed to get a majority at the last election? Should the Socialists stop campaigning for social equality because they faced electoral wipe out at the last Holyrood election? Would the Tories shut up shop if they failed to achieve a majority next year? Should the UK Labour Party have stopped campaigning for the working man because they did not see off the Tories in 2009 (well actually, they did, but that's a different story altogether)?
I would suggest that so long as the SNP exists they should be campaigning for independence. Many of us who thought that last September would be the only opportunity in their lifetime to achieve independence are energised by the prospect that another may present itself before too long - and the sooner the better.
And Alex Salmond, for all his faults, is the man who helped deliver that possibility. He brought us so close to independence and would have succeeded had the establishment parities not duped the Scottish people with their "vow" on further powers blurted out in panic by them immediately prior to September 18 and reneged on almost immediately on September 19.
So let's keep the argument going for the next referendum. My only hope is that next time we will see a bolder, more imaginative campaign involving a much higher profile alliance of pro-independence parties and not a campaign dominated by the SNP.
It would be good if that alliance were to form and start campaigning now.
William Thomson,
25 Lithgow Place,
Denny.
DURING my lifetime two politicians have set the Scottish political weather: Margaret Thatcher and Alex Salmond.
Scotland was virtually united against Mrs Thatcher. In contrast, Mr Salmond leaves office with Scotland bitterly divided.
Perhaps Mr Salmond should reflect during his no-doubt-brief sabbatical from front-line politics on the attributes of genuine statesmanship.
What good is an independent nation if it is not a united nation?
David Bryson,
31 Church Road,
Giffnock.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article