We learn yet another power company is not prepared to stay in the race to produce the next generation of nuclear power stations for the UK ("Centrica abandons nuclear power plant plan", The Herald, February 5).
We see also Cumbria County Council has refused planning permission for an underground waste repository site. ("Nuclear waste site plans are rejected by council", The Herald, January 31).
We are told Sellafield's clean-up will cost £67.5 billion and that's before we have any real solution to the waste. That is taxpayers' money, £1000 for each of us on top of our fuel bills, and that's just for one power station.
We are also told renewable energy won't work well enough or cheaply enough to meet our needs, particularly as wave and tidal power are not yet sufficiently technically and financially proven, even though they would most likely not encounter the same planning difficulties on visual and other objections as wind turbines.
I would like to wager if the Government in Westminster spent £67.5bn on research and development and company support for wave and tidal power instead of the few millions of pounds so far shoe-horned, kicking and screaming, out of successive administrations, we could have a world-leading technology, ready for exporting around the world, be self-reliant for energy and not have to worry about sending our young folk around the globe to be maimed or worse to protect oil interests in far-flung places.
Gordon S Cox,
24 North Grange Road, Bearsden.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article