YOUR excellent leader appears to have motivated the usual suspects to re-engage in the national policing debate ("Police summons for two chiefs", The Herald, November 24).
It would appear that some long-time opponents of the establishment of a national police force now see a role for themselves in providing the Government with advice on how matters should proceed from this point.
In answer to a specific question in Christopher Mason's observations (Letters November 26), the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents is of the belief that the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland should exercise the functions and duties traditionally performed by his predecessors in the constituent forces and that the SPA should ensure that he does so both wisely and prudently. That was our position as the enabling legislation was being framed and we were unaware of any contrary position prior to the Act gaining Royal Assent. Since that time Vic Emery, chairman of the SPA, and certain close colleagues appear to have adopted a new interpretation of the relevant sections of the Act and this has been the crux of the current unfortunate situation. Hopefully, under the scrutiny of the Justice Committee, sense will prevail and we can move forward with the more important matters requiring urgent attention prior to the birth of the new force on April 1.
Superintendent Niven Rennie.
National Vice President; Chairman, Strathclyde Branch Association of Scottish Police Superintendents, Stewart Street , Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article