As a group of eight organisations with more than 350,000 members who value Scotland's high quality landscapes, we commend the Scottish Government for recognising the value of Scotland's wild land, which is without price.
However, we must emphasise that all impacts upon valued areas need to be managed, not simply developments within such areas. We feel the Scottish Government, Scottish Natural Heritage and other organisations must now use all relevant policies to safeguard the experiential qualities that make Scotland's landscapes so valuable to residents and visitors.
We welcome the growing recognition in national government of the importance of Scotland's landscapes and the need to ensure their special qualities are not lost through unsuitable development. The current government consultations on the Scottish Planning Policy and the National Planning Framework are an opportunity to set the national planning rules for many years to come.
We support the increased protection proposed for national parks and national scenic areas, though this merely formalises the present de facto position.
Such protection should apply also where development is proposed beyond their boundaries that would impact upon the very qualities they were established to safeguard.
While the current greatest threat is large onshore wind developments, the same considerations should apply equally to any large development proposal, including transmission lines.
We fully support the recognition of the importance of wild land but are very concerned at the level of protection proposed for these and other important areas such as national nature reserves.
The current draft states that in such areas wind power developments will be acceptable "where it can be demonstrated that any significant effects on the qualities for which the area is identified can be substantially overcome by siting, design or mitigation".
This will allow inappropriate developments to be approved because of the lack of clarity in using subjective words such as "significant" and "substantially" when set against the primacy afforded in Government policy to economic and energy development.
Core areas of wild land as defined by Scottish Natural Heritage should be given the same level of protection as national scenic areas, including protection from visually intrusive developments beyond their boundaries. Several current planning applications lie within core areas of wild land. They must be rejected now if there is to be substance to the Government's affirmation of wild land's importance.
We are concerned at the proposal that locally significant landscapes, designated as such by local councils, should be regarded nationally as areas where there are "opportunities for wind farm development".
If local authorities and their electorates think particular local landscapes are important then this should not be over-ridden nationally.
The consultations close on July 23. Our members will expect the outcome to be a planning framework that ensures no more of Scotland's iconic landscapes are damaged.
Charles Strang, Convenor, Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland;
John Hutchison, Chairman, John Muir Trust;
Brian Linington, President, Mountaineering Council of Scotland;
Eleanore Hunter, President, The Munro Society;
David Thomson, Convener, Ramblers Scotland;
George Menzies, Chairman, Scottish Rights of Way and Access Society;
John Milne, Co-ordinator, Scottish Wild Land Group;
Sir Kenneth Calman, Chairman, National Trust for Scotland,
Hermiston Quay,
5 Cultins Road,
Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article