JAMES Mills (Letters, June 29) is virtually correct in his criticism of the list system for elections to the Scottish Parliament.
Such was intended to add an element of proportionality to what is otherwise a first-past-the-post system but has also been used by some parties and by independents to secure representation on the basis of what are effectively second preferences.
It would help matters if the list system were abolished and the additional members elected on the basis of constituency votes. Even better if all MSPs, except in the Western and Northern Isles, were elected by the Single Transferable Vote (STV) in multi-member constituencies.
In a Scottish context, now that we have general elections every five years for the House of Commons (in 2015, 2020, and so on) and the European Parliament (2014, 2019) consideration should also be given to having five-year spans for the Scottish Parliament and for our local councils so that we have only one major election in any one year.
Finally, we should review how vacancies, caused by death or resignation, in the Scottish Parliament and our local Councils are or are not filled. Margo MacDonald's place as a MSP has been unfilled since her death. What is effectively the Alternative Vote is an unsatisfactory method of filling vacancies in multi-member council wards where the original election was by the Single Transferable Vote (STV).
Dr Alexander S Waugh,
1 Pantoch Gardens, Banchory.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article