IN these final days of campaigning the intense pressure on all party leaders has reached the desperation stage.
Ruth Davidson accuses Jim Murphy of being a liar over his alleged apocryphal account of a constituent's treatment at the benefit agency ("Respectful debate is adhered to as promised, until thorny issue of welfare cutbacks is raised", The Herald, May 4). The next day Jim Murphy encounters mob heckling in Glasgow city centre. The Labour cry of Nationalist intimidation is immediately repudiated by Nicola Sturgeon ("Leaders unite to condemn Labour street rally abuse", The Herald, May 5).
Meanwhile, Nick Clegg reveals, via a Liberal Democrat peer, that his erstwhile coalition partner David Cameron had recently confided "a clear Conservative majority was doubtful" ("LibDem leader in decency attack on Osborne", The Herald, May 5).
Such unnecessary broken confidences do not auger well for any future coalition deals regardless of composition. Perhaps our politicians should occasionally pause and reflect on the Bard's words "as ithers see us". Such action might just restore some trust and confidence with the electorate whom our politicians purport to serve.
Allan C Steele,
22 Forres Avenue, Giffnock.
SO now we reach the finishing post of this long drawn-out and in many ways depressing General Election campaign. What have we learned?
Firstly we have discovered that negative campaigning is alive and well. All the Unionist Westminster parties have been falling over themselves to tell us what a terrible financial position we will be in without them even though the circumstances they describe will never be allowed to come to pass. They have harped on about a second referendum even though that has nothing to do with this election.
The major Unionist parties have displayed either a stunning ignorance of the workings of Westminster in relation to the right to form a government. Either that or, God forbid, they may actually have misspoken. To listen to Jim Murphy utilising erroneous facts to bully former Labour supporters back into the fold was certainly educational and underlined just how far we have moved on from Westminster politics which Murphy so plainly represents.
However , the steepest learning curve for most people was the realisation that to the Westminster elite we Scots are not only irrelevant but positively corrosive. I doubt that there can be many people left who still believe the Better Together love-in and any that still do exist with their head in the sand should read the English press and media with their constant attacks and denigration of everything Scottish. It is not by coincidence that every interview by the BBC in Scotland features Rab C Nesbit stereotypes.
For those who will sell their principles for the purpose of negative tactical voting I hope they can still look at themselves in the mirror.
David Stubley,
22 Templeton Crescent,
Prestwick.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article