RUSSIA does indeed have the longest land border in the world, as Edward A Cochrane says (Letters, February 16), and a tragic history of being repeatedly invaded from the West.
However, the trouble with the "buffer state" strategy is that logic inevitably drives these to be incorporated into the state they are seen as defending. Thus, Poland and the Baltic states were absorbed by the Soviet Union, as were the other countries of Eastern Europe. And we have the various partitions of Poland in the centuries before that. And we face the Ukrainian debacle today.
After hearing news of the successful detonation of the A bomb, Albert Einstein sighed and said: "Now everything is changed - except the way we think". He was profoundly right. It is folly to apply the logic of the pre-nuclear age, to a nuclear-armed world. The United Nations was formed in 1945 "to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind" and "to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest". These were noble aims, and this is still an achievable ambition.
At one time war between the clans in Scotland was seen as normal and inevitable. Now, it is unthinkable. In the past, independence was fought for with armies of men killing each other. In the (near, I hope) future it will be won by democratic process, and no one will kill or be killed.
We have eliminated war as an acceptable means of solving disputes between nations within the European Union, which is a splendid achievement.
We can and must aspire to do this worldwide, as was the inspiration behind the creation of the United Nations in 1945. Mankind must put an end to war, because war is evil.
Brian Quail,
2 Hyndland Avenue, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article