ALASTAIR Osborne believes it would be more productive to concentrate on persuading a future UK government to abandon Trident (Letters, July 6) rather than by supporting independence.
I, like many, others, have spent several decades trying to do just that – with a spectacular lack of success at the UK level.
I now realise that the trouble with our approach was that it is reasonable, and ethical, which is why we failed in the UK, but won the day in Scotland. Because the UK's addiction to the bomb transcends mere logic and morality; it is deeply rooted in the murky psyche of Britishness itself.
It was ever thus. Back in 1947, at the start of the nuclear age, Ernest Bevin famously stated that "we've got to have it, and it's got to have a bloody Union Jack on it". And this was under the most radical, socialist government in our history. Today Tony Blair writes in his autobiography: "I could see clearly the force of the commonsense and practical arguments against Trident, yet in the final analysis I thought giving it up too big a downgrading of our status as a nation." John McTernan, one of Blair's special advisers, said: "If we didn't have Trident we'd be Belgium. Some people would find that a comfortable place to be. I wouldn't. If Britain is going to be a major power, Britain should have the kinds of weapons a major power has."
So, ipse dixit. We have Trident because we are British. This is the ultimate symbol of Britishness. It is our sacrosanct Ark of the Covenant, granted by divine favour to us, but denied to all lesser breeds. Which is why all the Unionist parties support it, and none dares speak the undeniable truth that Trident is manifestly a weapon of mass destruction, and as such is criminal and illegal. Its deployment constitutes an ongoing war crime. To escape Trident, escape Britishness. That means independence.
Brian Quail,
2 Hyndland Avenue, Glasgow.
I CAN sympathise with Alastair Osborne. The requirement of nuclear weapons unfortunately lies in the threatened achievement of the political ideals of those not of the same mindset as ourselves. Since the murder of Abel by Cain, strength has been the winner, not logic.
Once the genie is out of the bottle, there is no going back, and the knowledge of nuclear power for evil is now an open secret – all that is required is the means of delivery.
As far as our own civil agreement with our own government is concerned, should we depend entirely on our (usually unarmed) police force for both our civil and national security? National security really means an army, and it means weapons, and it means death to someone – the use of nuclear weapons is abhorrent, and so is a six-inch shell or an improvised device exploding in your face.
National security worldwide has to seek and keep to a minimum the available nuclear weapons, but unfortunately the United Nations is about as powerful as the early parliaments of Scotland and England, high in ideals, but low in results. Another couple of centuries and hopefully that will no longer be the case, but in the meantime we have to be prepared for the sudden attack by a maniac, and accept the reality of the military standby that is required.
David Jones,
Castleton Drive, Newton Mearns.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article