Environment Secretary Richard Lochhead described the seas around Scotland as a "hotbed of biodiversity" following the discovery of a massive shellfish reef in Loch Alsh, near the coast of Skye ("Excitement over shellfish reef discovery", The Herald, December 27).
Sadly, this hotbed of diversity will be wrecked by Mr Lochhead's SNP Government in its mad dash to surround Scotland's coasts with offshore wind turbines and wave and tidal energy machines.
The shellfish reef near Skye bears witness to the richness of our marine ecosystems in Scottish waters. But this fragile environment will be devastated by the construction of giant industrial offshore renewables. Kelp forests, seagrass meadows and maerl beds, which are particularly common in shallow waters around the west of Scotland, will be most at risk; yet these are natural carbon capture and storage mechanisms, known as blue carbon sinks.
Some 93% of the earth's CO2 is stored and cycled through the oceans and Scotland's blue carbon sinks play a vital role in this process. Keeping them in good shape is one of the most important things we can do to keep climate change under control. Tearing up our blue carbon sinks to build useless and costly renewable energy machines is counter-productive and will lead to the release of millions of tonnes of stored CO2 into the atmosphere.
Preserving and restoring coastal and marine ecosystems should be the SNP Government's priority. Its mad dash for wind, wave and tidal energy is a cost to the environment, rather than a benefit.
Struan Stevenson MEP,
President of the Climate Change, Biodiversity & Sustainable Development Intergroup, The European Parliament,
Rue Wiertz, Brussels.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article