DURING the First World War, soldiers from all sides were courageous unto death.

Britain did win. But, as Ian Bell asks, is this sufficient to glorify war ("Why must the long dead be called up to fight for Union?", The Herald, February 1)? The trouble with David Cameron awarding £50m to mark the war and win votes, and with the likes of Jeremy Paxton and Dan Snow defending the war on TV, and Michael Gove going hysterical, is that they tend to ignore the effect on the deprived parts of Britain.

They should read Sylvia Pankhurst's account of daily life in east London where war meant the departure of husbands and nigh-on starvation for their families. Then they should consider post-war Britain, where politicians and top brass officers received fortunes while children without fathers were rewarded with poverty and many returning soldiers with unemploy­ment.

As the cautious historian Richard Holmes states in his study Tommy, The British Soldier on the Western Front, 2005, "let us never forget that generation" who gave their lives. But he concluded: "The First World War could have been averted by more astute diplomacy".

Bob Holman,

76 Balgonie Road,

Glasgow.