BILL Brown takes issue with the earlier letter from Brian Quail regarding the UK's nuclear deterrent, but there are two further points which should be made (Letters, July 9).
The first is that Mr Quail claims that the case for unilateralism has been won in Scotland. In fact, at every UK General Election since Hiroshima, Scots have voted overwhelmingly for parties which have been committed to retention of nuclear weapons. Like the rest of the UK, on the only occasion when unilateralism and neutralism were offered to the electorate by Labour, Scots voters turned towards the SDP (including voting in Roy Jenkins as MP for Hillhead), which had been specifically set up to maintain nuclear weapons and to keep the UK in Nato. It remains the case that no party at Westminster has a mandate to remove the nuclear deterrent.
The second point is that Mr Quail writes of the British psyche, which implies that there is a separate and distinctive Scottish psyche. Does the British psyche not include the Scots? Or does the human psyche change at Gretna? Or are all of the supporters of unilateralism in England really the Scots who have moved there and have retained their separate psyche? In fact, this is a new, mumbo-jumbo-laden version of the much-reported but never confirmed "different centre of political gravity". More directly, it is the assertion made by Nationalists that the rest of the British (but especially the English) are morally and politically inferior to Scots, which is nothing more than a supercilious intellectual chauvinism.
Peter A Russell,
87 Munro Road,
Jordanhill.
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article