I AM pleased Vic Emery, chairman of the Scottish Police Authority, felt moved to respond to my call for the need to deliver an effective and linked ICT system in support of the single police service (Letters, April 2).
Without one, officers and staff will maintain their current units, separated in terms of knowledge and management information due to a lack of ICT facilities, thereby negating the essence of what we are all trying to achieve in terms of an effective single service. If Mr Emery speaks to any member of the public trying to give information to the police, he will become aware of the frustrations people face. They are constantly being asked to repeat the same information to different police officers and staff who are trying their best to make do with antiquated or poorly thought-through technical solutions.
He rightly identifies four national ICT systems were provided for Scotland in the past 10 years. Had he been properly briefed he would have discovered that, as a senior police officer, I led teams that delivered two of them, the Criminal Histories System and the Scottish Intelligence Database. I have some understanding of the timelines involved and difficulties to be faced.
If we are all to be honest, the chairman would do well to acknowledge little progress has been made in the past five years in linking current national systems with the remaining databases to provide the breadth of information and intelligence vital to any law enforcement effort in this modern mobile world. As someone who has been positive in support of a single police service for more than a decade, I expect the Scottish Police Authority to deliver on its responsibilities in terms of new technology necessary to provide new levels of public safety.
My frustration is created by the slow pace of change in this regard, the resulting costs to the public purse and the evident lack of ambition over these past five years when preparations were being made for reform. I look forward to the brave new world just around the corner and trust the authority and the police service are ready for real reform and not merely a marginal change.
Graeme Pearson, Labour MSP,
The Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh.
I WONDER if the arrival of the much-vaunted Scottish Fire and Rescue Service with its economies of scale will bring an end to a tableau I see enacted on the A90 most weekdays. I travel between Perth and Dundee about 9am and see a small procession of fire appliances travelling from Dundee towards Perth. These vary from a command vehicle to run-of-the-mill fire tenders.
On my return journey about 5pm I see a similar convoy making a return trip in the opposite direction.
Presuming a journey time of about half an hour each way and associated crew and fuel costs there must surely be a cheaper way of achieving whatever cover these vehicles provide as it seems to have been going on for years now. The vehicles appear to be fully crewed on both journeys.
If there is a logical operational reason for this I would love to hear it.
David Russell,
71 Charles Street,
Penicuik.
IT is always interesting to have a new take on a much-debated subject and Mark Smith's article on local government is a change from his usual beat in popular culture ("Why does Scotland need 32 councils?", The Herald, April 2).
However, the controversial merging of our eight police forces is not a wholly convincing argument for further reducing our already depleted number of councils.
Western political philosophers such as Rousseau, Mill and Madison distrusted autocratic central government, arguing that liberty is better served by small, democratic units.
During the last 40 years I have watched as strong, responsive and accountable local councils were emasculated and Scotland became Europe's most centralised nation.
An unintended consequence of devolution was the transfer of more power from local government to Edinburgh and if the independence campaign succeeds this centralisation can only get worse.
I am a Franco-Scot with an Anglo-Swedish wife and compared to the control my French relatives or Scandinavian in-laws have over their affairs, I am almost totally impotent.
Observing the way the Scottish Government rides rough-shod over local decisions on, say, wind farms makes it clear how little protection we have from central tyranny.
Dr John Cameron,
10 Howard Place,
St Andrews.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article