The report about the credit rating of an independent Scotland by Jim Leaviss should be viewed as a welcome contribution, even if his conclusions run contrary to the report on the same day that Scotland is one of the richest areas in the UK ("Credit ratings warning about independence", The Herald, January 5).
Mr Leaviss's view that Scotland's rating would necessarily decline as it would be unable to print its own money, as either part of the sterling or the eurozone, misses another option.
In January 1993, following a referendum, Czechoslovakia split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia. On February 8, 1993, both countries established new currencies at equal parity and for a time the former currency circulated freely.
Over time the currencies' exchange rates varied reflecting their economic performance. Both countries are now in the European Union and in 2009 Slovakia joined the eurozone, while the Czech Republic remains outside.
After independence for Scotland, the English treasury may well be reluctant to let Scotland print sterling or even borrow money at competitive rates.
In that event a separate Scots pound should be established, initially at parity with sterling.
I have no doubt that given Scotland's energy resources a Scots pound would retain its AAA status.
A decision to join another currency zone could be taken if or when it suited Scotland's economy and the people wished it.
Gordon Morgan,
10 Prospecthill Road,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article