Charles Kennedy ("Why our destiny must lie in the direction of the F-word", The Herald, July 24) reminds me of some football matches in which a team, which has provided no more than some nice touches for 89 minutes, scores a goal from nowhere in the very last minute.
It certainly took Mr Kennedy long enough before he slipped in the "federal" word.
While there are sections of his piece that are cogent, his solution lacks sufficient validity to the case for real democracy. As with all the options before us it is, at heart, all about who governs whom. Why is it that politicians and would-be politicians believe that we need to be governed and that they are the ones who should rule us?
Sovereignty should lie with each one of us and, where there is a need to work together to make things happen over a wider area, we can enter into a co-operative body for that purpose. No-one should be empowered to tell another how to live beyond the need to maintain mutual respect.
The requirement for national issues to be resolved should be limited to such as defence, foreign affairs and as few areas as possible beyond that where cohesion is necessary. I am sure it would be possible to create such if it were pursued by us all. Politicians would, I suspect, be the least supportive of change.
This is the 21st century. Are we not grown up enough to take responsibility for our own lives or do we really need someone to be constantly taking charge of us?
Martin Cowie,
4 Main Street, Dunshalt, Fife.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article