I READ with interest the comments of Michael Greville (Letters, July 19) on the subject of standing authority for the wearing of firearms in Police Scotland.
As a retired police officer Mr Greville's contribution brought some balance and perspective to a debate which was in danger of becoming sensationalist and misleading.
You will recall that our association supported the creation of a national police service long before it became a political reality. One of the underlying principles of our position in this respect was the need to establish an equality of service delivery across the country which might ensure that members of the public did not face a higher level of risk merely due to the area of the country within which they chose to live.
The standing authority for firearms is now common across the vast majority of the United Kingdom. It enables the police to respond quickly and appropriately to any armed threat wherever it may occur. Indeed, Mr Greville rightly highlights the fact that the majority of the most infamous firearms incidents to have occurred in the UK have occurred in our more rural communities where suitably-armed officers may not have been readily available to protect their community.
In practice, an extremely small proportion of the police officers on patrol in Scotland on a daily basis are armed. Consequently, this policy does not threaten the unarmed nature of standard service delivery in this country, a traditional style which is widely respected and of which we are rightly proud.
Whilst the Chief Constable should always be prepared to explain his policies to the Scottish Police Authority or our elected politicians, we would defend his right to make operational decisions without interference. It is our belief that his stance on this matter is sensible and pragmatic and should therefore receive their full support .
Chief Supt Niven Rennie,
President, Association of Scottish Police Superintendents, Tulliallan Castle, Fife.
I NOTE with interest your report on Police Scotland's "doorstepping" proposal ("Police to doorstep sex crime suspects", The Herald, July 19). Let us think how this might play out:
First, malicious complaint is made by troublemaker. Secondly, police "doorstep" innocent man.Thirdly, neighbours see doorstepping. Fourthly, troublemaker joins dots. Fifthly, innocent man publicly branded as sex criminal.
One has to wonder whether whoever dreamed up these proposals is fit for office.
Brian D Finch,
64 Whitelaw Street,
Maryhill, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article