ALISON Rowat is quite right: much of Scotland's transport system is Toytown, and does credit to Noddy himself ("Lagging behind in race for five-star transport system", The Herald, July 3).
The current farce that has created the withdrawal of Sunday trains is Christmas pantomime stuff ("Sunday train services cut in productivity and pay row", The Herald, July 2). Oh yes, it is.
The trains operated by Abellio ScotRail are poxy - and these are the main-line versions (Chambers Dictionary: poxy, adj, anything unpleasant, contemptible or troublesome). Those serving Aberdeen-Inverness, the Far North and Kyle are poxier, while the roller skates trundling Glasgow-Galloway and to Oban/Mallaig worthy of a forgotten nation.
Abellio ScotRail promises us real trains on the Glasgow-Edinburgh services to Aberdeen and Inverness, but these won't appear until 2018. We poor passengers who also use the other lines will have to make do with the existing stock, with the laughable promise that it will somehow be improved.
Watch out for our new Borders Railway developing Alison's Toytown problems when it opens in September. Transport Scotland (as useless an organisation as I've ever come across in my years of dealing with it) has specified 158s to operate the line. These 158s are tawdry, shoddy, shabby and every other pejorative adjective, and are singular failures on the Kyle and Far North lines and between Aberdeen-Inverness in any ability to transport passengers comfortably, in toilet facilities, and in capacity for luggage and bikes.
There'll be an outcry from Borderers when these entirely predictable problems come to light - but as Alison Rowat pointedly states, we live in an advanced country which tolerates a toy-town transport system.
Gordon Casely,
Westerton Cottage, Crathes, Kincardineshire.
I READ with great interest two contrasting articles in same edition of The Herald. First, Robbie Dinwoodie bemoans the presence on our roads of "pumped-up" Minis and Fiats as well as sports utility vehicles that ape their bigger 4x4 brothers ("I bemoan rise of bogus monster on our roads", The Herald, July 2).
He recalls with nostalgia the design genius of his first Mini and a baby Fiat, but forgets to tell us how safe or efficient these vehicles were. The fact is, such cars have evolved to take account of the changing environment they operate within and their successors should not be denigrated. Many of us can hark back to the joys of motoring in the 1960s and 70s when the design of new cars was almost revolutionary, but would such cars and their drivers/passengers survive today?
In contrast, and only two pages before, Helen McArdle's Inside Track article "Road deaths up but long-term trend improving", The Herald, July 2) provided the facts and statistics about road deaths and injuries in Scotland over the last 65 years. The article reveals road deaths in Scotland are now less than 20 per cent of what they were in 1969 and serious injuries about 17 per cent of what they were in 1973. This is despite a far greater number of cars on our roads. While a range of factors have helped bring about these reductions, it is undeniable that improved car design and new safety features have played a significant role.
The issue of design versus safety was brought home to me when we changed our Mini last year from a much smaller 2004 model to its "pumped-up" 2014 brother. When I enquired about the increase in size I was told by the salesman that it was all down to European regulations on car safety that the previous smaller Mini model could no longer achieve. A balance clearly has to be struck between design and safety, which does not compromise the latter.
Mr Dinwoodie may feel offended by these "pumped-up manifestations of classic marques", but a thought should be spared for all those who have died or been seriously injured on our roads in or by vehicles that would never meet today's stringent safety standards.
Alasdair Bennett,
Brudhearg, Waterfoot, Carradale, Argyll.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article