MAY I respond to the comments of Brian Smith and Lesley Mackiggan on the current dispute between ambulance crews and the Scottish Ambulance Service (Letters, January 9).
Your leader ("Ambulance crews in risky battle over conditions", The Herald, January 7) makes it clear that the ambulance service is "not classed as an emergency service for ... pay and pensions, merely as an 'essential' one, like gas or electricity." . It is funded by the NHS whose resource is constantly under review, which results in underfunding and undermanning of ambulance crews. Considering the variety of calls that ambulances respond to, workers could claim to be more flexible and trained in broader areas of speciality than the other frontline services.
Most reasonable citizens would regard the routine 12-hour shifts that crews work as excessive and, without adequate meal times, impossible. That staff are obliged to waste precious time in dealing with voluntary disability, such as the alcohol-soaked late-night punters who only want the convenience of a free taxi home, is well documented.
Ambulance crews work to save lives in the same way as an A&E ward in hospital but with many times fewer staff, and whilst being driven (depending on the seriousness of a patient's condition) "briskly".
John Bedford
24 The Mount,
Balmullo, Fife.
For once, I have to disagree with Tom Shields, on being positively Scottish (The Herald, January 9).
His selection of tunes for Scottish country dancing is incorrect.
From experience The Black Eyed Peas' I Gotta Feeling is good for the Gay Gordons, while California Girls by Katy Perry is ideal for the Circassion Circle and Cee Lo Green's Forget You for Strip the Willow.
I would of course caution dancers to always select the radio edit versions.
Donald Macdonald,
1 Clair Road,
Bishopbriggs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article