BRIAN Donnelly's article regarding reserved places for Catholics at denominational schools in the Falkirk Council area once again highlights the inappropriateness of having a divided state education system in Scotland in the 21st century ("Discrimination claims as council keeps school places for Catholics", The Herald, October 17).
It is not enough to say that councils have a legal duty to offer denominational education, just because the Catholic Church handed over its schools to the state in 1918.
The two great legacies that could have taken root with this, as well as the Church of Scotland handover in 1872, should have been to guarantee provision of voluntary religious observance if requested, and the compulsory provision of religious, moral and philosophical studies in all tax-payer funded schools.
Christianity warrants greater coverage than other religions simply because this is a reflection of religious affiliation in Scotland at present. Crucially, Reformed and Catholic views should be given the majority of coverage.
I support independently-funded faith schools. However, when you have a situation where taxpayers are obliged to fund 377 schools in Scotland which present one faith position as being superior to all others; which discriminates against teachers in religious education, guidance and senior management posts; and which prevents children attending a school in their area, whilst at the same time obliging their parents and carers to pay to be discriminated against, it's clear that something is far wrong with our education system.
It's time for comprehensive education to truly be comprehensive - that is, all-inclusive.
B Stansfield,
8 Haggs Gate,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article