THE Health and Sport Committee report in to the Assisted Suicide (Scotland) Bill says that the Bill needs "significant amendment" ("Conscience' vote for MSPs on suicide Bill", The Herald, May 1).
I am not aware of any Bill, in Holyrood or Westminster, being perfect in its initial form, and fully accept that this may well need changes. However, I would urge our MSPs to support it through the initial Stage 1 so that this vital topic can be properly discussed in the Scottish Parliament.
Most Scots have indicated that they want a change in the law to allow assisted suicide, with safeguards. This issue is far too important to fall at the first stage.
Obviously it is disappointing that the "majority of the committee does not support the general principle of the Bill", but frankly this does not surprise me. Many MSPs believe wrongly that the status quo works well. It does not - it is not clear and gives no hope to those who are suffering intolerably at the end of their lives.
Most politicians are lagging behind public opinion on this subject. Much as we may hope, death will not go away. It is something we will all face and there is no sanctity in suffering.
A compassionate, caring society is judged by how it treats its sick and dying. Our legislators have a unique opportunity to make a real difference. They must not let this bill be kicked into the long grass.
Sheila Duffy,
Friends at The End,
3 Hamilton Drive,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article