TO Alison Rowat's question "is being a a regular, everyday sort of person enough to endear a Tory leader to Scots voters?
"there can only be one answer: No ("Not-so-nasty Davidson has a political mountain to climb", The Herald, February 20).
Personally, I like Ruth Davidson, just as I liked Annabel Goldie before her. I have relatives who vote Tory and I like them too. But I wouldn't vote for them. And while Ms Davidson no doubt thinks she has to do something to improve on her party's position in Scotland (one MP at Westminster, 15 MSPs at Holyrood) her Party Political Broadcast flagged up what is an important issue as we go into the General Election campaign. Should Party Political Broadcasts be used by political parties as a means to inform the public of the policies they have on offer, or is it acceptable to use their few allotted minutes to try to hoodwink the voters with cosy little domestic scenes similar to what we were treated to by the Tories the other night, which was designed to snuff out memories of what was a horrendous period in recent Scottish political history?
Naturally, one does not blame young Ms Davidson for the Thatcher years. She has no memory of them, but that is the point. Ms Davidson did not live through the Thatcher years and if she thinks the inappropriate lowering of a flag is "a steaming pile of nonsense"' that is nothing compared to what Mrs Thatcher did to Scotland, poll tax et al. And no matter how Ms Davidson may try to promote herself as a good sort, and even distance herself from her bosses in London with the odd roguish statement about flags, there is no getting away from the fact that Ruth Davidson in Holyrood still believes that power over Scotland should remain in Tory hands at Westminster, and even with Mrs Thatcher out of the equation, the Tories at their political heart are still a nasty lot.
Ruth Marr,
99 Grampian Road,
Stirling.
ALEX Gallagher (Letters, February 19) calls for Scots to vote Labour to get rid of the Tories. He has obviously not been listening to what has been going on. London Labour are promising to carry on the same failed austerity programs that the Tories introduced; the policies where people's income is squeezed so badly that income tax receipts to the treasury are falling and the National Debt continues to rise.
It is clear that for government revenues to exceed outgoings we need people earning decent wages and paying tax on them. There is no point in screwing those at the bottom for every last penny, relying on zero hours contracts and minimum wage earners and letting the rich and the big corporations evade their due. This is what the Tories are doing and it's what Labour were also doing before they were thrown out. Because of continuing austerity we are now coming to the stage where there is genuine fear of deflation, where wages and prices fall to the detriment of every business in the land.
The SNP have put forward a sensible set of measures to help the poor and get people working, earning and spending again. A proposal that harks back to after the Great Depression when the Americans introduced the "New Deal" by raising government spending to get things moving. This was followed by the longest period of sustained growth and prosperity that we remember.
The SNP have made it clear that they will never support the Tories in government but might work with Labour if they can get enough seats in England and Wales to make up the numbers. Provided Labour do not collapse in the rest of the UK there is better hope for a rainbow coalition with the SNP, the Welsh Nationalists and the Greens keeping Labour on a more sensible route than they now offer.
DS Blackwood,
1 Douglas Drive East, Helensburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article