WITH only a month to go before the independence referendum we are in a bit of a mess.
The agreed intention was that the residents of Scotland would have their vote and that the result would be binding on all parties, who would then set about the task of making the people's decision work to the best of their abilities.
There were scare stories about Westminster possibly reneging in the event of a Yes vote, but nobody believed them. Certainly, we had the affair about EU membership with the possibility raised that Westminster might block Scotland's admission, but they did not go as far as promising to use their veto; they merely encouraged other EU diplomats to issue that threat.
However, with the three main parties now swearing that they will not entertain the possibility of Scotland using the pound under any circumstances, the Rubicon is crossed. The agreement to work towards the best solutions possible in the event of a Yes vote has been rescinded at the very last moment with this flat rejection of post-decision negotiation.
This leaves the whole of Great Britain in a desperate situation over a matter that is fundamental to commercial concerns in England, Wales and Northern Ireland as well as Scotland. The party leaders, on all sides of the debate, have us heading on a course that, in the event of a Yes vote, will lead to financial disaster for many British companies.
The leadership of the Yes campaign must be mature enough to exercise responsibility even in the face of the irresponsibility of the Westminster leaders.
The only stance available for voters who value the financial security of the wider Great Britain, including Scotland, is to refuse to take part in what has become a sham on September 18.
Perhaps there will be a future opportunity when the ground rules will be respected.
Professor Dave Mearns,
Bridge Keepers Cottage,
Castlecary,
Bonnybridge.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article