IT is, of course, not difficult to understand the criticism and dissatisfaction expressed by David J Crawford (Letters, February 2).
However, in advocating the reversal of privatisation, he is indulging in what David Torrance describes, in another context, as "fantasy politics" ("Fantasy politics just crumble when the harsh realities bite", The Herald, February 2). Adding salt to the wound is the fact that ministers during the 1980s at the time of major privatisation, decided to ensure the sell-off of the energy sector by fixing the prices of shares at a low level, thus enabling many, in facile fashion, to secure substantial profits.
On a number of occasions the Labour Party proposed to renationalise the energy industry, among others. One hears nothing of that today, apart from parties unlikely ever to achieve power, because of the costs of so doing. The implementation of the policies of the Thatcher years has brought the situation where most of the companies operating this strategic industry in the UK are owned by foreign shareholders, whose interests are paramount. The national interest has become a secondary consideration. Our country has become, in this respect, a cash cow in the hands of boards based, in most cases, abroad.
It is my belief that future , mature review of the Thatcher years will conclude that the sell-off of the energy sector was a monumental mistake. Many customers now feel that they are being exploited through the charges being imposed, and, when they raise complaints, the service they receive can often only be described as disgraceful.
The Thatcher Government's policy in this regard has been shown to be irreversible and we have all borne the cost , and will continue to do so, not only in strict financial terms, but also in the lack of structured planning of future energy resources. However, the fact is that there is no major political party prepared to find the stomach or the wherewithal to return to where we once were.
Ian W Thomson,
38 Kirkintilloch Road,
Lenzie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article